Does any IR theory present a convincing framework for understanding Essay

Does any IR theory present a convincing framework for understanding b totally-shaped governance Why or why not Discuss with credit entry to - Essay ExampleThe first time that the concept of IR theory as an academic enlighten can be traced back to the book the Twenty Years Crisis which was published in 1939 and was written by E.H. Carr. The publication of this book, the occurrence of the First World War and the consequent complexities on the international sphere prompted the University of Wales, Aberystwyth to assign up a department dedicated to this subject (Burchill, et al., 2005). With the passage of time, conceptual models evolved in an attempt to beg off the complex nature of post World War II- world and currently, several theories are present that manoeuver to explain international politics. We now come to the second part of the question which is global governance. The concept itself is an nonagenarian wholeness but it has re-emerged in recent years by the name of globa lization. Global governance refers to interaction of governmental nature between transnational actors aimed at solving common issues and problems in the absence of a power of enforcement. These issues and problems may be solved by arrangements which may be nervous strainal in the form of laws, treaties and constitutions involving governments, IGOs, NGOs, MNCs and civil society or it may be informal in the form of guidelines or coalitions. ... Secondly, the benefits of globalization have to reach all levels of population so that global governance is sustainable. Thirdly, the difference between global governance and world government needs to be established. Global governance does not seek a central power for the system to work where as world government does. Global governance aims to coin some power away from the state in order for global institutions to be strong, autonomous and effective. still then can global economy, politics and culture be transparent. Global governance has several implicit in(p) themes such as a global economy, environmental concerns, democratic political legitimacy at all levels, conflict resolution, freedom of scientific, academic and communication modes and maintenance of peace and security. Successful examples have shown that this is only affirmable through effective interaction between state and non-state actors. While it has its own merits and demerits, global governance is a new chapter in world politics and it is worthy of being explained by at least one of the established IR theories. Of the several IR theories that are present, three will be discussed in an attempt to explain global governance in this piece of literature. They are realism, constructivism and liberalism. Realism is one of the pioneer theories of the correct of international relations. It consists of three main components namely statism, survival and self-help. Statism refers to the belief that only state actors play a major role in world politics and all t he rest of the functional elements of a political system are merely pawns. Survival refers to the belief that there the international system is based upon disintegration or